Optimal Investment with Lumpy Costs
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we analyze a continuous-time model of investment with uncertainty, irreversibility and a broad class of lumpy adjustment costs. We show that the two components of the optimal investment strategy, the investment trigger and the investment increment, can be found sequentially, and that the optimal investment increment maximizes a closed form function. Solving the model numerically, we find that adding a relatively small amount of variable adjustment costs often leads firms to invest in much smaller increments. We derive a measure of user cost that incorporates lumpy investment, and use it to show that as firms invest in bigger increments, the investment trigger increases as well. JEL classification: E22. ∗The authors would like to thank Betty Daniel, Bruce Dieffenbach, Michael Sattinger and seminar participants at the University at Albany for comments and suggestions. We benefited from the comments of two anonymous referees, one of which provided unusually detailed and helpful suggestions. We are particularly grateful to Michael Jerison, without whom this paper would not be possible.
منابع مشابه
Stepwise Investment Value under Stage Specific Parameters
comments on related versions. Abstract We provide a general model for comparing stepwise and lumpy investments, considering stage specific volatilities, drifts and possibility of project failure. Stepwise investments allow for interim project value realizations, instead of considering only a final project value as in sequential investments. We conceive of an environment in which stepwise invest...
متن کاملIdiosyncratic Shocks and the Role of Nonconvexities in Plant and Aggregate Investment Dynamics
We solve equilibrium models of lumpy investment wherein establishments face persistent shocks to common and plant-specific productivity. Nonconvex adjustment costs lead plants to pursue generalized (S,s) decision rules with respect to capital; as a result, their individual investments are lumpy. In partial equilibrium, this yields substantial skewness and kurtosis in aggregate investment, thoug...
متن کاملCorrect ( and misleading ) arguments for cap and trade ∗ Larry Karp
Cap and trade (CAT) results in lower abatement costs relative to command and control, but might increase industry marginal abatement cost, resulting in higher equilibrium emissions. With lumpy investment, command and control leads to multiple investment equilibria and “regulatory uncertainty”. CAT, a first best policy, eliminates this uncertainty. Command and control policies cause firms to imi...
متن کاملWorking Paper No. 07-24 Idiosyncratic Shocks and the Role of Nonconvexities in Plant and Aggregate Investment Dynamics
We study a model of lumpy investment wherein establishments face persistent shocks to common and plant-speci c productivity, and nonconvex adjustment costs lead them to pursue generalized (S,s) investment rules. We allow persistent heterogeneity in both capital and total factor productivity alongside low-level investments exempt from adjustment costs to develop the rst model consistent with th...
متن کاملDoes Lumpy Investment Matter for Business Cycles?∗
We present an analytically tractable general equilibrium business cycle model that features micro-level investment lumpiness. We prove an exact irrelevance proposition which provides sufficient conditions on preferences, technology, and the fixed cost distribution such that any positive upper support of the fixed cost distribution yields identical equilibrium dynamics of the aggregate quantitie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004